Demarcation without Dogmas
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper reviews how research on the demarcation problem has developed, starting from Popper's criterion of falsifiability and ending with recent naturalistically oriented approaches. The main differences between traditional contemporary approaches to are explicated in terms six postulates called assumptions. It is argued that all assumptions can be dismissed without giving up doing so might benefit further discussions pseudoscience. Four present-day movements evaluating boundaries science introduced: (1) philosophy pseudoscience, (2) social epistemology dissent, (3) agnotology, (4) evaluation expertise. Researchers working within these areas have abandoned some or
منابع مشابه
Two Dogmas of Belief Revision
The paper attacks the widely held view that belief revison theories, as they have been studied in the past two decades, are founded on the Principle of Informational Economy. The principle comes in two versions. According to the rst, an agent should, when accepting a new piece of information, aim at a minimal change of his previously held beliefs. If there are di erent ways to e ect the belief ...
متن کاملSeven INCOMMENSURABILITY AND DEMARCATION
as this does nothing to support the thesis that the members of the two tribes share any important moral beliefs and would not help the absolutist in arguing against relativism. The claim of the absolutist about the Crow and the . . thing is not at all clear. If the relativist contention is expressed as “what is right and what is wrong varies fiom culture to culture,” then whether we are to asse...
متن کاملTwo Dogmas About Quantum Mechanics
We argue that the intractable part of the measurement problem—the ‘big’ measurement problem—is a pseudo-problem that depends for its legitimacy on the acceptance of two dogmas. The first dogma is John Bell’s assertion that measurement should never be introduced as a primitive process in a fundamental mechanical theory like classical or quantum mechanics, but should always be open to a complete ...
متن کاملTwo Dogmas of Neo-Empiricism
This article critically examines the contemporary resurgence of empiricism (or “neo-empiricism”) in philosophy, psychology, neuropsychology, and artificial intelligence. This resurgence is an important and positive development. It is the first time that this centuries-old empiricist approach to cognition is precisely formulated in the context of cognitive science and neuroscience. Moreover, neo...
متن کاملThe Demarcation of Metaphor
There are three major issues which crop up in the discussion of metaphor among philosophers of language. They are: whether metaphor is cognitive, whether it is descriptive, and whether it is innovative. Those who deny that metaphor is cognitive are a group more often imagined than encountered, but if they existed they would consign the study of metaphor to affective stylistics, stressing the or...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Theoria
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1665-6415']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12395